Specialty Patient
Growth Lab
Explore how three specialty patient acquisition tracks could outperform a traditional $2,000-per-patient model—and build a recurring maintenance revenue base.
What happens as we scale?
Opportunity curves
Live scenarioCurves hold baseline acquisition efficiency constant at all spending levels. Actual results may not scale linearly. Low and high scenarios vary the menopause program price; all other inputs are shared.
New model vs. old model
Not true profit or collected-cash ROAS. These figures use contracted program prices and exclude delivery costs, fees, refunds, and collection timing.
Three acquisition tracks · editable offer economics
Change any price or baseline mix| Track / entry point | Baseline patients | Program price | Modeled patients | Monthly contract value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motherhood · trying to conceive Whole-journey program | 5 | $90,000 | ||
| Motherhood · pregnant Pregnancy-stage program | 2 | $8,000 | ||
| Motherhood · postpartum Metabolic Mommy Makeover | 3 | $18,000 | ||
| Thyroid track Specialty clinical program | 2 | $8,000 | ||
| Menopause track Lower / upper offer pricing | 2 | $8K–$12K | ||
| Total | 14 | — | 14 | $132K–$136K |
The baseline patient mix determines each track's share as ad spend changes. Edit the baseline mix or the prices to model different strategies. Patient counts are rounded to whole people using a largest-remainder allocation; charts use continuous expected values for smooth comparison.
Patient journey → recurring revenue
Maintenance assumptions are adjustable illustrations, not observed retention. The delay begins after program graduation; active memberships end after the selected duration. Maintenance revenue is modeled separately and is not included in the new-patient contract value above. No clinical outcomes or treatment suitability are assumed.
Share this scenario
The link stores the editable inputs in its URL. The HTML file also works offline in a browser.